Suzuki Gladius
Not a Goofy Bike

by Molly Gilbert  

The 645cc Suzuki Gladius was designed to be the newer, sexier version of the Suzuki SV650 – which has proven to be an affordable entry into the realm of reliable, new motorbikes.

Having ridden the original a few times, I’d have to say I prefer it to this – the newer ‘metrosexual’ sibling. The style looks sharp, but for performance purposes, I was bored. In fact, upon pulling up to a stop sign out in the middle of Midwest farmland, I thought to myself: “It has two wheels and a motor. It goes. End of story.” There was nothing very, um, memorable about it. It was like the local metrosexual you’d meet in a singles bar – seen one; you’ve seen them all.

In test riding this machine, the first thing that struck me about it was its size. It seemed so small! At about 450 lbs., this was definitely a bike you’d want to throw around – just looking at it I assumed it would be light, nimble and quick. However, upon rolling on the throttle in lower gears, a slight, sticking sensation appeared that I couldn’t quite figure out – almost snapping my head back unexpectedly a few times. Combine that with the pronounced pitching motion you get from the under-sprung fork, and you have some steering geometry issues that forced me to use my rear brake consistently to stabilize the see-saw movement of the chassis. However, in higher gears there was no such issue. And once at freeway speeds, this was a comfortable bike to ride with very little annoying vibration that can wear a rider down over longer distances.

I used to joke that my Ducati had a wide turning radius as you weren’t meant to turn the handlebars to turn – you were meant to be in a high speed *lean*. The turning radius on the Gladius similarly surprised me – I wouldn’t want to be on an Experienced Rider Safety Course doing tight figure eights with this machine, as I think I would struggle due to this.

The seat on the Gladius is very attractive with color-accented upholstery to match the bike’s paint. When we took the seat off the bike, we were amazed how thin and light it actually is. Now, if only it could be as comfortable to *sit* on as it looks like it should be. Again, while pretty, the seat was comfortable enough for a ride around the metro area, but take more than an hour to get somewhere, and I felt like I was sitting on a piece of plywood that was too wide. I usually don’t have seat issues I have never bought a custom seat for any of my bikes, whether a long distance rider or not, so I was surprised at how sore this one left me. Then again, I am no gold-medaled Iron-Butter, either, as my co-reviewer just so happens to be.

The seating position is very comfortable – just a shade sporty of ‘standard’, which is also very inviting to the newer rider. A little of that sportier forward lean makes bracing against the wind at freeway speeds much more comfortable than a straight, upwards position. I am 5-’9”, and I was not only surprisingly flat-footed at stops, but with bent knees, too, thanks to the seat being just short of 31 inches from the road. A blessing again for a newer rider more concerned with balance issues than performance.

Not to say this bike won’t perform – it certainly has enough torque and 66.8 horsepower (@ 8,500 rpm) sassiness to do what it is called upon to do, and the V-twin engine has a nice rumble to it that makes it sound real pretty. But again – look for substance, and I’d prefer the old school version. Some of the pretty pieces are all plastic, likely in an effort to cut costs and reduce mass, but with some of these pieces you almost wonder why bother? There are plastic molds around the engine and radiator that appear to be just for looks, and I had the thought that it might have looked better even more naked without them.

The visuals on the bike are large enough to see through your helmet visor without squinting or learning in closer, and everything was very user friendly. The mirrors are large and clear enough to see behind you, though I always saw my elbows taking up most of the view, no matter how much I adjusted them. The visuals in front of the rider are quite user-friendly and instinctual, with a large, digital speedometer and a larger, analog tachometer.

The handlebars were at an easy rise point and I was mostly comfortable until about hour two. Some slight tingle in the right hand made me realize I was leaning a bit too heavy on the bars. Both levers on the Suzuki were easily reachable and the clutch slipped smoothly into place for me with little thought or need for adjustment whatsoever. I got about 150 miles out the 3.8-gallon tank.

All in all, it is a sharp *looking* bike, but I couldn’t help be a bit bored by it’s performance. There are bikes you ride and you Just. Have. To. Have. And then there are those you will forget the next morning. For me, the Gladius was one of the latter. It just didn’t make that big of an impression on me. The Gladius would be fun for a beginning rider. Those wanting their feet to be flat on the ground will appreciate the friendly, lower seat height. This will be a great bike for the beginner who isn’t so beginner that they need to drop it a few times in the driveway to get broken in – but perfect for the newer rider finally ready for their first, flawless, pretty bike.

• Low seat height
• Delightful V-twin engine note
• Exceptional headlights

• Performance lags behind style
• Restrictive steering stops
• Phony plastic covers

by Thomas Day
For the record, a “gladius” is a“short, thrusting [Roman] sword… designed both for thrusting and for cuttingin close-in combat.” The Suzuki Gladius is a short (56.9” wheelbase, 30.9” seat height) Japanese motorcycle designed for thrusting and cutting through urban traffic combat. A goofy name doesn’t define a bike, unless the bike is a Drifter, Rebel, Virago, or Valkyrie. The Gladius is not a goofy bike.

In 1999, at the peak of the big-assed cruiser boom, Suzuki broke ranks with the me-too crowd and imported a radical (for the US) new aluminum-framed naked standard, the SV650. The SV was a huge seller and a raft of competitors from Honda to Ducati hustled to create models to compete in the larger-than-anyone-expected mid-sized bike business.

Over the years, the SV grew a partial fairing, traded it’s pretty oval-tube trellis frame for a new square tube truss frame, added fuel-injection, put on a full fairing, added ABS brakes, and that great motor got better every year. For the current evolution, many of the new upgrades to the 650-twin power plant are only available on the Gladius, which may be saying something about the future of the model.

I have a 29” inseam and I didn’t have any trouble swinging a leg over the Gladius’ 30.9” seat height, even after a day of riding or a miserable day of yard work. Once on the bike, I’m on the balls of my feet with both feet on the ground. Suzuki worked hard to make the Gladius’ profile as narrow as possible. That makes for a bike that could be right for a variety of riders. The peg position is almost straight down from the rider’s butt. As the pegs are about 17” from the seat, which means your knees are bent into a sportbike angle. The riding position is similar to the Kawasaki ER-6n or the Ducati 696 Monster and the styling is similar, too.

The steel-framed Gladius is only eight pounds heavier than the aluminum SV-S, which is a pretty impressive feat. This low mass shows itself on the road. Steering is tight and precise. The bike is a point-and-shoot device. Think where you want to go and it will take you there. At speed, the Gladius steers quickly and easily. The low speed turn radius is a little on the wide side, but getting stability out of a short wheelbase requires a sacrifice or two. The suspension is stiff, but it limbered up after 100 miles or so. Over some pretty rough Minnesota two-lanes, a little leg lift from the seat was all it took to smooth out those messed up roads. The 17” Dunlop Qualifier tires were a pleasant surprise. Like most sportbikes, the SFV handles so well it makes you want to be a better rider to deserve the bike you’re riding. I am incapable of riding this motorcycle hard enough to take it to the edges of its capabilities.

The remarkably compact Gladius console has two buttons, six idiot lights, three digital displays, a tachometer, and right-left turn signal blinkers. The four idiot lights on the left side of the console are for fuel injection status, neutral, the two-way low fuel warning light, and the bright headlights indicator. There are two idiot lights in the tach housing: the oil pressure sensor and water temperature warning which combine with oil pressure/water temperature LCD icons for more useful information. There is a gear position display in the tach housing. The digital speedometer can be set for miles or kilometers. The odometer display doubles as a fault display for start-up and the fuel injection. That same counter can be set to display a clock, the two tripmeters and a reserve fuel odometer, which starts recording distance when the low fuel warning trips.

This might be the first Japanese sportbike ever made with a well-designed seat. The seat platform is extremely light and the padding is thin and firm, but it was reasonably comfortable for a long day’s excursion. I probably wouldn’t cross the country on a Gladius, but a day’s ride to Duluth and back was enjoyable. On the other hand, the passenger seat appears to be an afterthought, as it is on most sportbikes. There is a little bit of room between the seat and fender compartment for gloves, maps, or more tools. The base of the seat hides a pair of straps intended for cargo loops, a nice feature for a commuter.

The 6-speed transmission is so smooth that it practically shifts itself. The cam-operated clutch is light and predictable; at least as good as the best I’ve ever experienced. That thoughtful engineering is something of a waste because the DOHC 90-degree V-twin engine is so strong that three gears would probably have done the job for most riders. You can enter corners in just about any gear you choose and still get out with plenty of power. Suzuki has put a lot of engineering into the 39mm injection system to provide reliable cold starts, stable idle operation, low emissions, and smooth power delivery. Suzuki’s race-tested SCEM cylinder liners should extend the motor’s lifetime dramatically.

In 6th gear, at 5,500 rpm, the Gladius is running at an indicated 75mph; redline is at 10,500 rpm. The bike is smooth right from idle and was strong from 3,500 rpm up. A critical commuter concern is efficiency. I estimate that Molly and I got about 54mpg for the test ride, assuming the tank was full when Bruce picked it up. My last fill-up burned at an impressive 68mpg and I didn’t make any effort to be conservative once I passed the 500-mile mark on the odometer. The 3.8-gallon fuel tank ought to give the Gladius close to a 200-mile range. Suzuki seems to have figured out how Harley and Ducati get away with macho-sounding exhaust systems and still skate under noise restrictions. The exhaust note is mostly bass-frequencies, exploiting the EPA’s A-weighting spec and making the bike sound larger than a 650. The under-engine catalyst and fuel-efficient dual-plug design puts the Gladius into the EURO 5 emissions territory without a fresh air injection system.

At highway speeds, the mirrors are practically vibration-free and they are positioned so that they actually show you a rear view. The raptor-looking headlight is seriously good. The 55W low beam is wide, short, and bright, illuminating the road and close to 180º of the path of travel. The 60W high beam retains the near-field qualities, but extends the illumination distance three to four times with the extended light focused in the middle of the highway. This combination of good lighting and an unobstructed view of traffic in front and behind the rider makes for an exceptional commuter bike.

Parked next to my V-Strom, the Gladius looks tiny. Some motorcycles don’t photograph well. Practically everything from KTM falls into that category. Most Ducatis look clunky in two dimensions. The Gladius may be one of those bikes. I’m not a fan of the blue and white color combination, but even the pictures of the red and black version didn’t do much for me. In the flesh, the Gladius is a pretty cool looking bike. It got nothing but compliments from everyone who asked about it. The Gladius comes in four color combinations and is designed to be easily customized by the use of plastic bits from current and future versions of the bike. The frame covers are about $120 for a pair, the tank side covers are about $220 a pair, and the front fender is $120. Our metal flake-black test bike took a lot of compliments from everyone who checked it out.

For basic maintenance tasks, the SFV is very user-friendly. One 4mm Allen wrench allows you to remove the side-panels and two tank screws. Hold the tank up with the handy tank prop and you have clear access to the radiator overflow tank, air filter, spark plugs, valve covers, rear shock adjustments and other bits. The only complicated service access on the motor is the front cylinder’s center plug, which requires removing the plastic panels around the radiator and lowering the radiator. The oil filter is easily accessible as is the drain plug and filler.

At $6,899 the Gladius is in the same price territory with the Kawasaki ER-6n ($6,399 MSRP) and Yamaha’s FZ6R ($6,989 MSRP). The high end of this genre is the Ducati Monster 696 ($8995 MSRP) and the Aprilia Shiver 750 ($9995 MSRP). I think Suzuki hit the market in an unclaimed spot with the SFV and a lot of riders will appreciate their effort. After a day of exploring Wisconsin’s letter roads. I wound my way up to Duluth and ended up parked in front of Aerostich’s building. Andy Goldfine came out to inspect the Gladius and was generally impressed. He’d put the SFV on his “short list” of bikes he’d consider as replacements for his well-worn R80GS. Andy described the Gladius as the kind of bike Japan designs for the “home market”: refined, detailed, stylish, and extremely functional. That sounds like a well-considered summary of this motorcycle’s qualities.

Selected Competition: APRILIA Shiver 750, BMW F650GS, DUCATI 696 Monster, HONDA NT-700V, KAWASAKI ER-6n Versys, TRIUMPH Street Triple, YAMAHA FZ6R


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.